BharathStaff AI Engineer · Production Multi-Agent PlatformsLinkedIn

Services

Hands-on agent engineering past the demo stage

Multi-agent design, fine-tuning, self-improving agents, retrieval, and eval gates, shipped as PRs in your repo. Scope and pricing are agreed on LinkedIn; nothing is listed here.

Engagement flowHOW WE STARTAYou describeProblem + constraintsBDiagnostic5-day scorecardCPilotFixes in your repoDScaleFractionalWHAT YOU GETWritten findingsranked failuresMerged PRsnot slide decksRunbookyour team extends

How to start

Two common ways to start. Deliverables are fixed; we align terms on a short LinkedIn intro.

Agent system diagnostic

5 business days

We map how your agents behave in production: tools, handoffs, retrieval, and eval coverage. You get a clear picture before committing to a build phase.

  • Eval scorecard on agent workflows (tools, retrieval, generation, multi-step paths)
  • Failure taxonomy: top regressions ranked by user impact
  • Fix recommendations with effort estimates
  • 30-min readout with your eng lead

Scope and commercial terms agreed on LinkedIn.

2-week productionization pilot

2 weeks

Hands-on work in your repo, not a slide audit. Week 1 establishes a baseline; week 2 lands fixes and eval integration.

  • Week 1: failure taxonomy + eval baseline merged in your repo
  • Week 2: quality gate + 2 critical-path fixes on prod agent or retrieval flows
  • Handoff runbook your team extends

Often follows the diagnostic when there is a fit. Terms scoped on LinkedIn.

For AI consultancies & dev shops

White-label delivery on fixed SOWs. Your brand with clients; my hands in the codebase.

  • Multi-agent systems, eval harnesses, fine-tuning, and knowledge layers under your client SOW
  • ADRs, runbooks, and client-ready documentation included
  • Commercial terms and SOW shape agreed on LinkedIn
  • 4h ET overlap as a committed daily window

How I work

  • Typical engagement: 3–6 months
  • 4h US Eastern overlap daily, held as a fixed calendar block
  • Week 1 includes PRs in your repo (with prod access you scope). First milestone is shipped work, not decks.
  • Availability and scheduling constraints confirmed in writing before kickoff.

Full service menu

Multi-Agent System Design

For: Teams shipping collaborative agents, workflows, or voice/chat automation past prompt chains.

  • Agent roles, handoffs, and tool policies for your product
  • Orchestration patterns (single vs. multi-agent, when to specialize)
  • Failure recovery and human-in-the-loop checkpoints
  • ADRs your team can extend (not shelfware)

Typical duration: 1–2 week design sprint or 4–12 week build advisory

LLM Fine-Tuning & Domain Adaptation

For: Products that need models to speak your domain, not generic base-model behavior.

  • Fine-tuning strategy (QLoRA, full fine-tune, or hybrid with retrieval)
  • Dataset curation, eval sets, and regression gates for model updates
  • Integration with your agent stack and release process
  • Guidance on when fine-tuning beats prompting alone

Typical duration: 3–8 week sprint

Self-Improving & Tool-Using Agents

For: Teams building agents that iterate, call tools, and improve from feedback.

  • Tool schemas, routing, and guardrails for safe action in prod
  • Self-improvement loops: critique → revise → verify (with eval boundaries)
  • Trace-backed logging so you can debug multi-step runs
  • Patterns for long-horizon tasks without runaway cost

Typical duration: 4–8 week sprint

Knowledge & Retrieval for Agents

For: Agents that need governed context from docs, APIs, or databases.

  • Hybrid retrieval (structured + unstructured) aligned to agent decisions
  • Tenant-scoped knowledge boundaries
  • Ingestion and refresh patterns your team operates
  • When retrieval belongs in the agent loop vs. offline indexing

Typical duration: 4–8 week sprint

Evaluation & Production Readiness

For: Teams shipping agent changes without knowing what regressed.

  • Trace-backed evaluation harness for workflows and tool paths
  • CI quality gates aligned to your release process
  • Production-readiness checklist (evals, rollback, tenant safety)

Typical duration: 2–4 week bootstrap + optional retainer

Incident Recovery (Agent Programs)

For: Live agent products where behavior, tools, or workflows broke in production.

  • Hands-on recovery on agent flows, retrieval, and eval gaps
  • Root-cause write-up and prioritized fix list
  • Runbooks so the team can detect similar failures earlier

Typical duration: Time-boxed recovery (days–weeks) + optional retainer

Fractional Agent AI Lead

For: Startups and scale-ups needing Staff-level agent ownership without a full-time hire.

  • Roadmap across agents, fine-tuning, retrieval, and evals
  • Architecture ownership and review gates on agent PRs
  • Mentoring on multi-agent design and production iteration
  • Bridge between research ideas and shippable agent products

Typical duration: 3–6 month engagements, scope on LinkedIn

FAQ

Do you write prompts?
Only when it serves the agent system. Prompting sits inside orchestration, tool design, and fine-tuning, not as a standalone package.
Audit vs. hands-on?
Default is hands-on: PRs in your repo from week one. Read-only reviews are available, but they are not the default entry point.
How do engagements start?
Message on LinkedIn to align on problem, scope, and timeline. Diagnostic or pilot shapes above are common starting points; terms are agreed privately after we connect.
Fine-tuning vs. RAG vs. agents?
I help you choose the layer that fits: orchestration, fine-tunes, retrieval, and evals. This is not a DevOps or platform-infra engagement. The focus is agent behavior in your codebase.
Research vs. consulting?
PhD (MARL) is part-time and informs multi-agent coordination design; consulting engagements are delivery-focused with clear artifacts.

Tell me what is breaking in production, or message on LinkedIn to scope a diagnostic or pilot.